Extract, resolve, and annotate legal citations from court opinions and legal documents. Zero dependencies. TypeScript native. ~37KB brotli.
npm install eyecite-tsLive extraction
In Smith v. Jones, (9th Cir. 2020) (holding that the standard applies), the court relied on . . See also (2019); .
Real legal text, citations highlighted inline. Click any highlight to inspect the parsed metadata — extracted entirely in your browser.
In Smith v. Jones, (9th Cir. 2020) (holding that the standard applies), the court relied on . . See also (2019); .
500 F.2d 123
CaseCitations don't stand alone. Parallel reporters describe one case and subsequent history chains decisions together — and with resolution on, Id., supra, and short forms link back to their antecedents. eyecite-ts connects them into one graph.
Resolved — structural links plus Id./supra back-references.
From cases and statutes to dockets, constitutional provisions, and neutral cites — each parsed into typed, structured data.
500 F.2d 123
CaseNo. 12-3456 (S.D.N.Y. 2024)
Docket42 U.S.C. § 1983(a)(1)
StatuteU.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1
Constitutional123 Harv. L. Rev. 456
Journal2020 WL 123456
NeutralPub. L. No. 117-263
Public Law87 Fed. Reg. 1234
Federal Register136 Stat. 4459
Statutes at LargeId. at 125
Id.Smith, supra, at 130
Supra500 F.2d at 140
Short CaseStatutes across 52 jurisdictions
One citation carries far more than volume and page. eyecite-ts infers court, disposition, justices, subsequent history, and classified parentheticals.
See also Doe v. Roe, (2d Cir. 2020) (en banc) (Brennan, J., dissenting) (holding that the test applies), cert. denied, (2010).
Paste any legal text. Everything runs in your browser — nothing is uploaded.
In Smith v. Jones, (9th Cir. 2020) (holding that the standard applies), the court relied on . . See also (2019); .
Found 5 citations
500 F.2d 123
Case42 U.S.C. § 1983
StatuteId. at 130
Id.123 Harv. L. Rev. 456
JournalSmith, supra
Supra